go to top

The Realist Prism: Without Consensus, U.S. Red Lines Can’t Force Action

Friday, May 3, 2013

There has been a great deal of talk in U.S. foreign policy circles about “red lines” and the strength of American resolve in recent days. Much of it has revolved around the emerging evidence that chemical weapons, namely sarin gas, may have been used in the Syrian civil war, which drew attention back to the Obama administration’s declarations in 2012 that the use of unconventional weapons could be a trigger for American intervention in that conflict. The sarin discussion came on the heels of a brief controversy surrounding allegations made by Chinese dissident Chen Guangchen that the Chinese government was not living up to the commitments it made to the United States to end the diplomatic standoff in May 2012 after Chen sought refuge at the U.S. Embassy in Beijing.

Both episodes were cited by critics to accuse the Obama administration of undermining U.S. credibility by not taking more forceful action, whether to become militarily involved in Syria or to put greater pressure on Beijing. As a result, according to this argument, the administration is sending a signal of American weakness that will dishearten friends and encourage rivals. ...

Want to Read the Rest?
Login or Subscribe Today.
Get unlimited access to must-read news, analysis and opinion from top experts. Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 9,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.

YES, I want to subscribe now.