go to top

Obama’s Missile Defense Maneuver Likely to be Counterproductive

Friday, March 29, 2013

On March 15, U.S. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel announced that the Obama administration would shift tactics on ballistic missile defense (BMD). Specifically, the U.S. will shift its focus from overseas, regional ballistic missile defense toward greater protection of the homeland. However, while the political symbolism of this switch may be positive, the strategic and military consequences may well be counterproductive. As a result, the move looks more like short-term politicking than a new approach to strategic thinking.  

To some observers, Hagel’s announcement was a significant and welcome change in policy. Under the new plan, the U.S. Missile Defense Agency will most notably deploy 14 more ground-based interceptors in the United States to augment the 30 interceptors that are already in silos in Alaska and California. The plan also calls for the agency to deploy more radar assets overseas, notably in Japan; pursue the possibility of a third interceptor site on the Eastern Seaboard; and modernize the kill vehicle that sits atop its long-range interceptor missiles. At the same time, the Pentagon will cancel phase four of the so-called European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA), unveiled in 2009, which involved deploying the SM-3 IIB interceptor missile to Europe. ...

Want to Read the Rest?
Login or Subscribe Today.
Get unlimited access to must-read news, analysis and opinion from top experts. Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 9,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.

YES, I want to subscribe now.