go to top

Strategic Horizons: Strategic Retrenchment the Smart Way

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Strategic retrenchment is all the rage among America's national security experts. There is increasing agreement that the global strategy of the past two decades is politically and economically unsustainable, so Washington must cut its security commitments and scale down engagement around the world, particularly when it involves the U.S. military.

This is not a new idea. After World War II, some political leaders and opinion shapers encouraged President Harry Truman to follow American tradition and disengage from Europe and Asia. That pressure ended only when the extent of the Soviet threat became clear and North Korea invaded South Korea. After the fiasco of Vietnam and the economic stagnation that followed, there was widespread sentiment that America should "come home," particularly on the political left. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, the idea of disengagement or a diminished American world role resurfaced once again. Having won the Cold War, the feeling was, the United States could downgrade its role in Asia, Africa and Europe. ...

Want to Read the Rest?
Login or Subscribe Today.
Get unlimited access to must-read news, analysis and opinion from top experts. Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 9,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.

YES, I want to subscribe now.