go to top

Strategic Horizons: America's Failed Strategy in the Islamic World

Wednesday, Sept. 19, 2012

U.S. strategy in the Islamic world is teetering on collapse. Angry, often violent crowds from Morocco to Afghanistan attacked anything associated with the United States or the West during the past week, from embassies and schools to fast food restaurants. All indications are that the protests accurately reflect a deep and persistent anger toward the United States, one that can be easily manipulated for nefarious purposes.

For decades, the United States was concerned with little but stability in the Islamic world, building partnerships with a sordid cast of monarchs, civilian dictators and military despots. While this approach continues to be applied in a few countries, it was largely discarded after Sept. 11, when the Bush administration recognized that the United States could not rely on friendly dictators to control violent extremism and hope for the best. America’s new strategy for addressing Islamic extremism took the form of counterinsurgency: The United States would attack terrorists directly while simultaneously undercutting support for extremism. While this made sense, it proved tricky to execute. ...

To read more,

enter your email address then choose one of the three options below.

Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 10,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.