After Niger, Is America’s ‘Light Footprint’ Counterterrorism Strategy Sustainable?

After Niger, Is America’s ‘Light Footprint’ Counterterrorism Strategy Sustainable?
A U.S. Marine major walks past a line of soldiers from the Uganda People’s Defense Force as they engage in weapons training at the Singo facility in Kakola, Uganda, April 30, 2012 (AP photo by Ben Curtis).

The United States has always been a reluctant superpower. While most political leaders and observers have believed that promoting security around the world benefits the United States, the public has to be sold on the idea of global activism. Among other things, this makes it important to control the costs of involvement in distant places without direct ties to the United States, particularly U.S. military casualties.

This has been done in two ways: by relying on security partners to bear the brunt of deterring and fighting adversaries, and by sustaining an advanced U.S. military to overmatch enemies when it does fight. Following the 1991 Gulf War with Iraq, for instance, the U.S. military pursued a high-tech “revolution in military affairs” designed to augment its battlefield superiority. But after 9/11, it was no longer enough to have an advantage on conventional battlefields. As transnational networks of terrorists and insurgents became America’s primary enemies, the challenge was finding a way to deal with this very different threat while continuing to limit the strategic costs, particularly to American lives.

President George W. Bush opted for a big-ticket approach to the new threat based on invading and attempting to transform nations that supported extremists. Whether that would have ultimately defeated terrorism or not, it was unaffordable and politically unpalatable. The United States could not invade every nation where terrorists found sanctuary or sustain interventions for the decades needed to truly transform those places.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.