After Libya Failure, New Thinking Needed for Removing Dictators

After Libya Failure, New Thinking Needed for Removing Dictators
Then-French President Nicholas Sarkozy, Libya’s then-National Transitional Council leader Mustafa Abdul-Jalil and British Prime Minister David Cameron visit Benghazi, Libya, Sept. 15, 2011 (AP photo by Stefan Rousseau).

Deciding whether to remove a dictator by force has long been a vexing problem for American policymakers. With the end of the Cold War in the 1990s, many dictators fell with little direct U.S. involvement. But that simply weeded out the herd, leaving the most ruthless and hardened, like Moammar Gadhafi in Libya, Saddam Hussein in Iraq, the Kim dynasty in North Korea and the Assad dynasty in Syria. After the attacks of 9/11 and U.S. President George W. Bush’s “global war on terror,” they, too, were in America’s sights to one extent or another.

The insurgency in Iraq should have shown American policymakers the difficulty and importance of engineering a new political order and economy once a tyrant is gone. But in 2011, Washington joined several NATO allies to help remove Gadhafi, believing that doing so would head off a humanitarian disaster. As it turned out, Gadhafi’s demise simply shifted Libya’s civil war to one pitting militias and extremist groups against each other. Catastrophe was not averted but simply drawn out.

Now the Libyan fiasco has reignited debate in the United States over removing dictators. Writing in The Atlantic last year, Conor Friedersdorf noted that immediately after Gadhafi’s demise, American policymakers and foreign policy experts considered the operation “both a success as a discrete humanitarian intervention and a case study to apply to future liberal-internationalist interventions.” People began to talk of the “Libya model” as a way to deal with tyrants at a minimal cost.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.