About Get Alerts Login
July 30, 2010
Browse by Regions and/or Topics

World Politics Trend Lines

Login to Discuss EmailEmail | Print IconPrint | Share Icon Share | Reprint IconReprint

More McCain

Judah Grunstein | Bio | 31 Mar 2008

I thought I'd toss this Daily Standard piece by Joseph Loconte on McCain's foreign policy address into the mix. He seems to come down somewhere between Hampton and myself on what McCain offers: a little uneasy about the idealist hurdles a League of Democracies will present to a realist agenda, but ultimately reassured by being more sympathetic to McCain than I probably am.

I'd add that should McCain become president, America will undoubtedly be tied down in Iraq for the foreseeable future, meaning that whatever potential dangers for military adventurism his democracy agenda presented would be moot.

As for the democracy agenda itself, I'm trying to get my hands on a copy of the report mentioned in this press release. It's an economic analysis which concludes that political liberty, and not poverty, is the key corollary for terrorism. Significantly, it's neither highly repressive nor highly democratic states, but those in the middle band that are most likely to breed terrorism. That suggests that McCain's freedom agenda doesn't well serve the centrality of the terrorist threat to his national security vision, since the highly repressive states it would most likely target are not the highest terrorist risks. I'll post more when I get a copy of the report, but it seemed worth mentioning.

A final thought is that in retrospect I might have placed too much emphasis on McCain's democracy promotion in my critique of his speech. It's there, and especially prominent in his definition of success in Iraq. But it's really his suggestion that we create a privileged multi-lateral League of Democracies (to replace existing mutli-lateral institutions? Loconte notes that the UN isn't mentioned once in the speech) that is the biggest policy innovation. Nikolas Gvosdev, like Loconte, wonders how realistic it is to assume that democratic values will trump strategic interests in international relations. I wonder whether it's the right tone to strike to re-varnish our post-Bush global image.

Login to Discuss EmailEmail | Print IconPrint | Share Icon Share | Reprint IconReprint