Why Cancel the C-17?
Judah Grunstein | Bio | 22 Oct 2009
Looks like I'm not the only one that was puzzled by the planned
cancellation of the C-17 transport plane. Unlike other high-ticket aircraft programs,
like the F-22, the C-17 is a plane that is currently in high
operational demand. And with the global shortage of strategic airlift,
it's one that is a very attractive export -- even to countries like
France, which has traditionally avoided outsourcing its aircraft
procurement, but now finds itself in a pinch given the delays and cost
overruns in the A400M program. Even
in the context of the COIN vs. conventional debate, the C-17 seems to
pass the test, since it fills a role in humanitarian airlift (full spectrum operations), as well as in the force projection necessary
for boot-heavy COIN missions. Whether or not it could compete with the
A400M when the latter eventually comes online remains to be seen. But the timing seems odd to pull the plug now. Anyone have a good answer for this?
- 2point6billion
- Abu Aardvark
- Abu Muqawama
- Andrew Sullivan
- Arms Control Wonk
- Armchair Generalist
- Contentions
- Counterterrorism Blog
- Danger Room
- Daniel W. Drezner
- DefenseTech
- Democracy Arsenal
- Friday Lunch Club
- A Fistful of Euros
- Foreign Policy Watch
- FP Passport
- French Politics
- The Global Buzz
- Global Guerrillas
- GlobalPost
- Global Voices Online
- The Interpreter
- Inside South America
- Intel Dump
- Juan Cole
- The Moor Next Door
- Musings on Iraq
- New Atlanticist
- Pakistan Policy Blog
- PostGlobal
- Progressive Realist
- Prospects for Peace
- Real Clear World Blog
- Registan
- Small Wars Journal
- Syria Comment
- Thomas P.M. Barnett
- U.S. Diplomacy
- War is Boring
- War and Piece
- The Washington Note
- The Washington Realist




