In August 2009, Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad pledged to "complete the process of building institutions of the independent State of Palestine in order to establish a de facto state apparatus within the next two years." The Palestinian Authority (PA), he said, would do this "despite the hostile occupation regime." Indeed, Fayyad argued that by focusing on building institutions, Palestinians would "expedite the end of the occupation," because their state would "emerge as a fact that cannot be ignored."
Fayyad's two-year deadline expired in August 2011. Is Palestine ready, in institutional terms, for statehood? The question may appear hypothetical because no one really expects a free, independent Palestine to be born at the United Nations in September 2011: The political conditions are not right, as the U.S. will not support a U.N. resolution. What's more, the Palestinians have not yet implemented the reconciliation agreement reached between Fatah and Hamas in Cairo in May, and Israel has no interest in ending the occupation. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
- TWO WEEKS FREE.
- Cancel any time.
- After two weeks, just $9 monthly or $59/year.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Global Insights: Syria Crisis Overshadows Broader Turkey-U.S. Tensions
- The Realist Prism: China the Likely Winner if U.S. Intervenes in Syria
- Russia Tries to Manage Arab Awakening From the Outside
- The Realist Prism: Narrowed Focus in U.S.-Russia Relations Proves Productive
- World Citizen: Israel’s Syria Strike Reflects Favorable Cost-Benefit Calculus