A stalemate has set in between President Barack Obama and the U.S. Congress over the president's authority to initiate and continue combat operations against Libya. This should surprise no one. The limits on the president's constitutional authority to wage war are as uncertain today as they were when the Constitution was ratified. Complicating this uncertainty is that pesky law passed by Congress in 1973 over President Richard Nixon's veto: the War Powers Resolution (WPR).
Enacted in response to the widespread belief that it had become far too easy for a president to commit the nation to war, the WPR sought to revive congressional primacy in war-making decisions. The law had one clear objective: require express congressional approval before initiating hostilities in almost all cases. Accordingly, the WPR states that the president may lawfully commit U.S. forces into hostilities or into situations where hostilities are imminent only pursuant to a declaration of war, express statutory authorization -- like the post-9/11 Authorization for the Use of Military Force -- or an attack on the United States or its armed forces. The law also prohibits reliance on treaties, appropriation statutes or any other "implied" support to justify initiation of hostilities. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
- TWO WEEKS FREE.
- Cancel any time.
- After two weeks, just $11.99 monthly or $94.99/year.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Diplomatic Fallout: Having Tried Hope, Obama Turns to Fear to Reaffirm U.S. Power
- Strategic Horizons: Assessing Obama’s Legacy in National Security Policy
- The Realist Prism: Though Politically Attractive, U.S. ‘Train and Equip’ Missions Often Disappoint
- Global Insights: Once Again Relevant, NATO Will Now Be Judged on Effectiveness
- Diplomatic Fallout: Despite Fighting Words, NATO Haunted by Three Recent Defeats