U.N. Peacekeeping as Public Diplomacy

A subtle evolution of United Nations peacekeeping operations is underway. If the first of these missions kept an agreed-upon peace, and later missions sought to make peace, several countries now use these operations to advance their foreign and economic policy agendas, and raise their global profile. This shift, selective as it is to date, may potentially raise the standard of conduct in U.N. peacekeeping operations increasingly fraught with charges of criminal behavior, corruption, lack of accountability, and general ineffectiveness. However, there are significant downsides to this approach.
The global movement of people, information, goods, and services creates new opportunities, but also new threats for peacekeepers. With the immediate and persistent availability of information, peacekeepers and their home countries will be increasingly held accountable for their actions, as well as their failure to act -- a situation countries were long able to avoid. ...
To read the rest, subscribe to World Politics Review
Buy This Article
- PDF from Scribd
- Kindle version from Amazon
- Despite Summitry, Hurdles Remain for Northeast Asian Multilateralism
- Global Insights: Factoring China Into U.S.-Russian Nuclear Arms Control
- The Realist Prism: Chen Saga Pits U.S. Rhetoric vs. Interests
- The New Rules: Globalization's Future Depends on Stable U.S.-China-India Order
- ASEAN Struggles for Relevance in South China Sea Disputes


