At a meeting last week in Tallinn, Estonia, the foreign ministers of NATO's member states began addressing the question of what to do about the estimated 200 U.S. tactical nuclear weapons stationed in Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Turkey. The missiles' controversial presence is shaping up to be the most important issue facing the alliance's heads of state during their November 2010 summit in Lisbon.
Many critics argue that these weapons have no plausible military purpose. In a World Politics Review briefing early last month, Johan Bergenäs offered a variety of reasons why the Obama administration should unilaterally withdraw the systems. Above all, Bergenäs argued, "Removing U.S. tactical nuclear weapons from Europe would generate a metaphorical boom for nuclear disarmament, re-energizing Obama's nonproliferation agenda and restoring confidence in its core objectives." ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
- TWO WEEKS FREE.
- Cancel any time.
- After two weeks, just $9 monthly or $59/year.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- For Europe in Afghanistan, Long-term Commitment Despite Lack of Interests
- U.S. Delay on Anti-Nuclear Terror Measures Hinders Global Efforts
- The Realist Prism: China the Likely Winner if U.S. Intervenes in Syria
- World Citizen: In Spain, a Turn to 'None of the Above'
- As U.S. Pivots, Britain Hedges Its Military Bets