The Economist recently broke the news that NATO would soon develop contingency plans to defend Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania against Russian attacks. In an unexpected shift in policy, the new plans would mark the first time since the end of the Cold War that the Atlantic Alliance has specifically pinpointed Russia as a threat.
NATO has been down this road before. In October 2008, Gen. John Craddock, then NATO's supreme commander, asked the members of the alliance for permission to draft Baltic defense plans. But at the time, France and Germany disapproved, out of fear that it would compromise NATO's relations with the Kremlin. Regardless of changes in the alliance's assessment of threats since late-2008, these concerns should be as valid as ever. New contingency plans that label Russia as a potential enemy would signal a return to Cold War politics and likely produce unfavorable consequences. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
Sign up for two weeks of free access with your credit card. Cancel any time during the free trial and you will be charged nothing.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Global Insights: Spoilers Emerge as Iran Nuclear Talks Reach Delicate Endgame
- The Realist Prism: U.S. and West Should Not Count Russia’s Putin Out Just Yet
- Global Insights: After Russia’s Exit, Time for West to Close the Book on CFE Treaty
- EU Sets Pace With Ambitious Emissions, Clean Energy Targets
- Diplomatic Fallout: U.S. to Europe: Don’t Go Soft on American-Led Global Order