Instead of being viewed as an attempt to promote regional stability, U.S. military presence around the world is increasingly seen as "imperial overstretch," or "empire." Despite these critics, the United State's global command scheme in the post-Cold War era is reflective of a new and evolved military presence, and one that has grown more area-specific with time.

The New Rules: The Evolution of the U.S. Military

By , , Column

U.S. plans to expand its military presence in Colombia have elicited predictable condemnations from anti-American elements in South America, but also concern from friends who see them as encroachment from our ongoing "war on drugs." Similarly, in another part of the world, Africa Command boss Gen. "Kip" Ward's repeated assurances that the United States isn't interested in setting up bases on the continent remains a tough sell, given the new regional combatant command's explicit mission to expand U.S. military cooperation there.

Critics are quick to call every new American boot on the ground "imperial overstretch," or "empire." But as often as we hear those buzz-phrases these days, to my mind they mischaracterize both the intent behind, and the actual evolution of, our nation's expanding overseas presence in the post-Cold War era. ...

To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review

Free Trial

Sign up for two weeks of free access with your credit card. Cancel any time during the free trial and you will be charged nothing.



Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.

request trial


Already a member? Click the button below to login.