U.S. plans to expand its military presence in Colombia have elicited predictable condemnations from anti-American elements in South America, but also concern from friends who see them as encroachment from our ongoing "war on drugs." Similarly, in another part of the world, Africa Command boss Gen. "Kip" Ward's repeated assurances that the United States isn't interested in setting up bases on the continent remains a tough sell, given the new regional combatant command's explicit mission to expand U.S. military cooperation there.
Critics are quick to call every new American boot on the ground "imperial overstretch," or "empire." But as often as we hear those buzz-phrases these days, to my mind they mischaracterize both the intent behind, and the actual evolution of, our nation's expanding overseas presence in the post-Cold War era. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
- TWO WEEKS FREE.
- Cancel any time.
- After two weeks, just $11.99 monthly or $94.99/year.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Boko Haram, Corruption Purges Put Cameroon on Edge
- In Shelving Kenyatta Trial, ICC Confronts Limited Options in Africa
- The Realist Prism: Though Politically Attractive, U.S. ‘Train and Equip’ Missions Often Disappoint
- Global Insights: Once Again Relevant, NATO Will Now Be Judged on Effectiveness
- Global Insights: Managing Partnerships, not Enlargement, Is NATO’s Real Challenge