One of the major objectives of President Bush's trip to Europe last week was to secure additional international support for the war in Afghanistan. Although European governments generally reaffirmed -- and in several cases announced slight increases in -- their military and economic commitments to the beleaguered Afghan government of Hamid Karzai, which remains entangled in a protracted insurgency with the Taliban, their declared level of support appears to fall short of that needed to allow the Afghan government to consolidate its control of the country.
The members of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) continue to reaffirm their commitment to the stabilization mission in Afghanistan while quarreling over how to share its burdens. ISAF currently has over 52,000 personnel, from 40 nations, including all 26 NATO countries. An additional 19,000 American troops serve under a separate U.S. command, while the Afghan Army currently numbers about 50,000 moderately capable troops. Even so, ISAF commanders continue to complain about shortages in key mission areas as well as about the limitations ("caveats") that the national governments impose on where their troop contingents can serve and under what conditions. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
- TWO WEEKS FREE.
- Cancel any time.
- After two weeks, just $11.99 monthly or $94.99/year.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Energy, Defense Deals Highlight Vietnam’s Role in India’s ‘Act East’ Policy
- Global Insights: Responding to Crises, SCO Finally Embraces Expansion
- World Citizen: Don't Underestimate Significance of India-Japan Love Affair
- The Realist Prism: Though Politically Attractive, U.S. ‘Train and Equip’ Missions Often Disappoint
- Despite Modi Visit, Nuclear Impasse Continues to Limit India-Japan Ties