go to top
Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton testifies before the House Benghazi Committee in Washington, Oct. 22, 2015 (AP photo by Evan Vucci).

The Use, and Abuse, of Hindsight on Libya, Syria

Michael A. Cohen Wednesday, Nov. 4, 2015

Several weeks ago, Hillary Clinton spent 11 hours testifying before a congressional committee about the deaths of four Americans, including the then-U.S. ambassador, Chris Stevens, in Benghazi, Libya, in September 2012. For anyone watching this spectacle, little new was gleaned, except for the fact that Clinton is a remarkably disciplined politician—and that whatever threat the GOP’s Benghazi obsession might have posed to her presidential prospects in 2016 is effectively over.

What would have been of far greater interest, to both policy analysts and voters, is a look back on the U.S. decision to intervene in Libya, which Clinton strongly supported. As Libya has descended into anarchy, a prevailing conventional wisdom has emerged that the U.S. made a massive mistake in getting involved there, and that Clinton should face greater scrutiny and criticism for the mess that country has become. ...

Want to Read the Rest?
Login or Subscribe Today.
Quarterly
$ 17.99 for 3 months
  • Two-week FREE trial access.
  • Cancel during trial and pay nothing.
  • Just $17.99 quarterly after trial.
Try It FREE
Annual
$ 59.99 for 1 year
  • Two-week FREE trial access.
  • Cancel during trial and pay nothing.
  • Just $59.99 annually after trial.
Try It FREE