Round two of the trial of Salim Hamdan is now underway in earnest. Most will recall that round one ended when the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the military commission established by an order issued by President Bush violated constitutional separation of powers limitations (with a plurality of the court also concluding the commission violated the humane treatment mandate of the law of war). Congress responded rapidly to that ruling by passing the Military Commission Act of 2006, providing the president with a statutory basis for resurrecting the commissions.
Pursuant to that statute, Salim Hamdan was recharged and once again brought to trial before the commission. In what must have been an ironic coincidence, his second trial began on the same day the Supreme Court heard arguments in the Boumediene case challenging the restriction of habeas corpus access for Guantanamo detainees. That challenge, however, in no way restricted the ability of the government to press forward with Hamdan's trial. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
- TWO WEEKS FREE.
- Cancel any time.
- After two weeks, just $11.99 monthly or $94.99/year.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- How Latin America Can Maximize Its Shale Gas Potential
- Strategic Horizons: 2016 Election Will Redraw Road Map for U.S. National Security
- Global Insights: When it Comes to Nonproliferation, China Has Been a ‘Free Rider’
- The Realist Prism: Time for the U.S. to Make Hard Choices on Russia, Middle East
- Strategic Horizons: The Rise of the Islamic State and the Evolution of Violent Extremism