go to top

Khobragade, Keystone Cases Illustrate Fragmented U.S. Policy

Nikolas Gvosdev Friday, April 25, 2014

If a national security policy is to be worth more than the paper it is printed on, it needs to serve as a guide to making tough policy choices by outlining priorities and indicating where trade-offs may have to be made. But controversies around two long-standing U.S. strategic objectives show how poorly strategy is guiding current policy.

These objectives are to develop a new and deeper partnership between the United States and India and to open up new sources of energy in the Western Hemisphere to decrease U.S. dependence on overseas sources. One secondary impact of these strategies would be to weaken Russia’s clout as an energy superpower, especially in relation to Europe. Another would be to weaken the emerging coalition of “eastern autocracies”—Russia and China—and “southern democracies”—Brazil, India and South Africa—that has in recent years worked to block U.S. and European initiatives in various international bodies. ...

Want to Read the Rest?
Login or Subscribe Today.
Monthly
$ 11.99 for 1 month
  • Two-week FREE trial access.
  • Cancel any time.
  • $11.99 each month.
Try It FREE
Quarterly
$ 17.99 for 3 months
  • Two-week FREE trial access.
  • Cancel any time.
  • $17.99 every three months.
Try It FREE
Annual
$ 59.99 1 year
  • Two-week FREE trial access.
  • Cancel any time.
  • Just $59.99 a year.
Try It FREE