Much American analysis of the past week’s events in Ukraine has tended to focus on the advisability of removing President Viktor Yanukovych and getting Ukraine to sign an Association Agreement, including a free trade pact, with the European Union. But little attention has been paid to what might happen the day after. This thinking echoes the prevailing line a decade ago during the Orange Revolution, which assumed that everything would be fine once the protesters’ demands were met. Instead, the absence of a coherent, sustained Western approach in the aftermath of the Orange Revolution led to its unraveling.
Ukrainian Deputy Prime Minister Serhiy Arbuzov acknowledged this week that the government is prepared to consider the possibility of early presidential and parliamentary elections, one of the demands put forward by the coalition of opposition forces that have generated the largest protests seen in Ukraine since the 2004 Orange Revolution. The massive outpouring of discontent was triggered by Yanukovych’s last-minute decision not to sign an EU Association Agreement, in part because of concerns that Ukraine would face intense economic retaliation from Russia if Kiev were to proceed. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
- TWO WEEKS FREE.
- Cancel any time.
- After two weeks, just $11.99 monthly or $94.99/year.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Strategic Horizons: Emerging Threat of Lone Wolf Terrorism Requires Cold Rationality
- World Citizen: Modi Reboots India’s Foreign Policy With ‘Zero Problems’ Approach
- For NATO, Benefits of Adding Finland and Sweden Outweigh Costs
- Global Insights: Putin Courts Modi to Advance Russia-India Economic Ties
- Russia Sanctions, Ruble Woes Raise Cost of Putin’s Ukraine Gamble