By Sept. 10, 2001, the U.S. Agency for International Development was increasingly slouching toward irrelevance. Once famous for its ability to directly implement development programs, USAID was forced to shed expertise in some of its core competencies. But things at USAID, as in so many aspects of American life, changed dramatically after Sept. 11, 2001. For USAID, the driver of that change was the U.S. military invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq and the massive reconstruction efforts that followed.

The Crucible: Iraq, Afghanistan and the Future of USAID

By , , Feature

By Sept. 10, 2001, the U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID, was increasingly slouching toward irrelevance. Although USAID Administrator Brian Atwood had instituted important reforms during his tenure at the helm during the 1990s, the agency had been badly bloodied by a contentious political battle with the Republican-controlled Congress over whether it should be folded into the State Department. Remarkably, Atwood held both the State Department and Sen. Jesse Helms at bay when Congress tried to abolish USAID and place its remains in Foggy Bottom.

But Atwood and the agency paid a steep price for their resistance, and angry Republican lawmakers were determined to get their pound of flesh. Severe budget cuts triggered layoffs and a 29 percent reduction in staff at USAID between 1995 and 2000. By 2001, USAID’s direct-hire staff was about half the size it had been 20 years earlier. Using attrition to stay afloat, USAID was left with a graying staff, as more than one-third of its foreign service employees were nearing retirement age. ...

To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review

Free Trial

Sign up for two weeks of free access with your credit card. Cancel any time during the free trial and you will be charged nothing.



Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.

request trial


Already a member? Click the button below to login.