As a strategic approach, the U.S. pivot or rebalance to Asia seeks to expand the American political, economic and military presence in the Asia-Pacific region. While this realignment is not only about China, it is also evident that much of the thinking behind it relates to China, and in particular how a more engaged American leadership in Asia could be potentially productive in steering Beijing toward a path that, from the U.S. perspective, would be beneficial for regional and global order.
The strategic shift has led many observers to perceive the rebalance as a means for the U.S. to maintain primacy in Asia at the expense of China. Some interpret it as the latest incarnation of a U.S. containment or hedging policy toward China. Others suggest that a more robust U.S. presence emboldens some Asian countries to take a more assertive stance in their territorial disputes with Beijing. In short, a common perception is that the U.S. pivot is inimical to Chinese interests and ambition in the region. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
Sign up for two weeks of free access with your credit card. Cancel any time during the free trial and you will be charged nothing.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Strategic Horizons: Emerging Neo-Feudal World Leaving U.S., Global Security Behind
- Reality Check: The Past’s First Lesson: Beware of False Historical Analogies
- Strategic Horizons: For Hint of Iraq’s Future, Take Another Look at Vietnam War
- World Citizen: BRICS Still Have a Long Way to Go From Grouping to Alliance
- Reality Check: The Real Iraq War Debate’s Lessons for U.S. Foreign Policy