As a strategic approach, the U.S. pivot or rebalance to Asia seeks to expand the American political, economic and military presence in the Asia-Pacific region. While this realignment is not only about China, it is also evident that much of the thinking behind it relates to China, and in particular how a more engaged American leadership in Asia could be potentially productive in steering Beijing toward a path that, from the U.S. perspective, would be beneficial for regional and global order.
The strategic shift has led many observers to perceive the rebalance as a means for the U.S. to maintain primacy in Asia at the expense of China. Some interpret it as the latest incarnation of a U.S. containment or hedging policy toward China. Others suggest that a more robust U.S. presence emboldens some Asian countries to take a more assertive stance in their territorial disputes with Beijing. In short, a common perception is that the U.S. pivot is inimical to Chinese interests and ambition in the region. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
- TWO WEEKS FREE.
- Cancel any time.
- After two weeks, just $11.99 monthly or $94.99/year.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Modi, Xi Put India-China Economic Ties Ahead of Border Tensions
- Strategic Horizons: U.S. Strategy for Defeating the Islamic State Group Won't Work
- A Tale of Two Interventions: U.S. Content to Contain Islamic State Group and Ebola
- The Realist Prism: Can Obama Count on ‘Coalition of the Willing’ to Fight Islamic State Group?
- Global Insights: Responding to Crises, SCO Finally Embraces Expansion