Whatever happens next in the ongoing drama between the U.S. and Syria over the use of chemical weapons, it would be difficult to conclude that President Barack Obama has performed impressively in his handling of the crisis in Syria. Obama’s response to the slow-motion disintegration of that key Arab state has been marked by a combination of neglect, ambivalence and improvisation.
The latest chapter, played out over the past couple of weeks, showed the president at long last responding to what by all appearances was a massive use of chemical weapons by forces loyal to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. That triggered a decision by Obama to use U.S. military force against Assad, followed by a sudden and unexpected detour—taking the matter to Congress—and then an accidental, inadvertent proposal by Secretary of State John Kerry to allow Syria to turn over its chemical weapons to international representatives. The plan, put in motion by Russia, is filled with complications, and there is no way of knowing if it will come to a successful completion. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
- TWO WEEKS FREE.
- Cancel any time.
- After two weeks, just $11.99 monthly or $94.99/year.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Strategic Horizons: U.S. Support for Syrian Rebels Serves Political, not Military, Purposes
- Diplomatic Fallout: Frustrations Mount for Both the U.S. and Its Foes at the U.N.
- Global Insights: For U.S. and South Korea, Missile Defense Looms as Next Big Challenge
- The Realist Prism: The International Order Faces a Fateful and Perilous Winter
- Strategic Horizons: Updated Weinberger Principles Still a Guide for Use of U.S. Force