Since the start of the Middle East uprisings in early 2011, the region has slipped into a period of uncertainty, with a battle for political influence and legitimacy stretching across state borders. Two rich countries in the Persian Gulf region, Saudi Arabia and Qatar, have operated with different and sometimes divergent strategies for trying to shape the political transitions in Egypt and impact violent struggles for power in places like Syria.
Understanding this dramatically changed regional context is important in analyzing the approaches of Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Since 2011, the competition for power and influence in the Middle East has been increasingly multipolar and multidimensional. It is multipolar because no single country has become the dominant actor in the region, whether Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia or Qatar. The fractured nature of regional politics, combined with the complicated internal divisions and still-nascent ideological debates in many transitioning countries, make it nearly impossible for any single country to achieve a dominant, hegemonic position in today’s Middle East. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
- TWO WEEKS FREE.
- Cancel any time.
- After two weeks, just $18 monthly or $118/year.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Diplomatic Fallout: West Needs New Rules to Contain Proxy Wars With Russia
- Turkey’s Schizophrenic Opposition Unlikely to Defeat Erdogan and Unified AKP
- The Realist Prism: Israel-Hamas Conflict Locked In by Both Sides’ Strategic Assumptions
- Bending Rules on Egypt Could Cost African Union Leverage on Transition
- Growing Threat of European Fighters in Syria Highlights Need for EU Cooperation