During the 1990s, the U.S. Department of Defense concluded that it was in a "strategic pause." With the Soviet Union gone and no equal threat on the horizon, the Pentagon had the luxury of doing things like building a "futures" industry to think big thoughts about long-range changes underway in the security environment and the nature of armed conflict. But today strategic futurists face hard times. As the defense budget shrinks, money and time for forecasting and analysis are hard to come by. There is no doubt that cuts in defense spending are needed, but if thinking about the future falls by the wayside, the result could be deadly. After all, big changes in the nature of conflict and warfare are already underway. Preparation must begin now.
Current trends suggest that the future strategic environment will be very different from that of today. Take the global movement toward increased connectivity -- the density of human connections is greater today than at any time in history. The profusion of information sources and narratives is changing the way people develop beliefs, perceptions, attitudes and preferences. It is often impossible to know where an idea originated and thus difficult to judge its validity, leading to an erosion of traditional authority and legitimacy. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
Sign up for two weeks of free access with your credit card. Cancel any time during the free trial and you will be charged nothing.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Global Insights: Russia Tensions Threaten U.S. Arctic Council Agenda
- Strategic Horizons: After Libya Failure, New Thinking Needed for Removing Dictators
- Armed and Ready: The Pentagon’s Assertive New Cyber Strategy
- The Realist Prism: As Stakes Rise, Muddling Through No Longer Viable Option for U.S.
- Global Insights: New Technologies Complicate U.S.-Russia-China Arms Control