Will Ban Ki-moon leave a substantial legacy when he completes his second term as secretary-general of the United Nations at the end of 2016? This question may seem premature. Ban has been in office for more than six years, but he has nearly four more to go. Yet, as Ban has already discovered, a U.N. secretary-general’s schedule is consumed by a mix of urgent crises and hollow diplomatic rituals. Last week, for example, Ban oversaw the signing of a new peace deal for the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, but also had to make time for a speech launching the International Year of Quinoa.
If Ban wants to focus on a small number of strategic priorities, he needs to seize them now and stick to them despite all the distractions that lie ahead. Neither of his predecessors was able to do this. Boutros Boutros-Ghali, secretary-general from 1992 to 1996, was forced from office after one term after losing the Clinton administration’s trust. Kofi Annan’s second term went off the rails as he battled scandals over the U.N.’s administration of the oil-for-food program for Iraq and sexual abuse by peacekeepers. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
- TWO WEEKS FREE.
- Cancel any time.
- After two weeks, just $18 monthly or $118/year.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Iran’s Structural Constraints Limit Rouhani’s Domestic Agenda
- Strategic Horizons: Russia’s Ukraine Invasion Signifies a Changing Global Order
- In Lebanon, New Government Unlikely to Herald New Political Era
- Diplomatic Fallout: U.N. and OSCE May Offer Least-Bad Options in Ukraine
- The Realist Prism: Venezuela, Ukraine Challenge Assumptions Behind Defense Cuts