Warnings by defense officials about the dire consequences of defense sequestration for America’s military presence and influence abroad are primarily intended for domestic legislators. But they cannot help but have an impact on other governments as well. And how those governments choose to regard the possibility of American defense cuts could have serious implications for future U.S. grand strategy.

The Realist Prism: With Defense Sequestration Looming, U.S. Needs a New ‘Nixon Doctrine’

By , , Column

The looming threat of sequestration is presenting the American national security community with a dilemma. Outgoing Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has laid out what some of the consequences will be if Congress and the president cannot agree on a plan to rescind the automatic spending cuts that are set to go into effect next month: One of the two U.S. aircraft carrier groups deployed to the Persian Gulf region will be withdrawn; deployments to Latin America will be canceled; and the U.S. presence in Europe will be reduced. Panetta even warned that a diminished U.S. military presence overseas would, over time, run the risk of relegating the United States to second-class power status.

These arguments are primarily intended for domestic legislators, but they cannot help but have an impact on other governments as well. And how those governments choose to regard the possibility of American defense cuts could have serious implications for future U.S. grand strategy. ...

To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review

Individual
Free Trial

  • TWO WEEKS FREE.
  • Cancel any time.
  • After two weeks, just $18 monthly or $118/year.
subscribe

Institutional
Subscriptions

Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.

request trial

Login

Already a member? Click the button below to login.

login