go to top

The Problem With Two Asias

Evan A. Feigenbaum, Robert A. Manning Friday, Jan. 18, 2013

In a recent WPR feature essay on economic integration and security competition in Asia, Amitav Acharya used our article in Foreign Policy, “A Tale of Two Asias,” as a conceptual framework for thinking about the future of this dynamic and important region. But his piece, “Why Two Asias May be Better Than None,” misunderstands or fails to address many of our key arguments.

On some points, we agree with Acharya. For example, he notes that Japan “started the process” of economic integration in Asia, or what we call “Economic Asia,” and “still plays a vital role in it.” We made precisely this point when we argued that “Tokyo has long been an exemplar of Economic Asia and a motive force behind the quest for greater regional economic integration.” ...

Want to Read More?
Login or Subscribe Today.
Monthly
$ 11.99 for 1 month
  • Two-week FREE trial access.
  • Cancel any time.
  • $11.99 each month.
Try It FREE
Quarterly
$ 17.99 for 3 months
  • Two-week FREE trial access.
  • Cancel any time.
  • $17.99 every three months.
Try It FREE
Annual
$ 59.99 1 year
  • Two-week FREE trial access.
  • Cancel any time.
  • Just $59.99 a year.
Try It FREE