The first iteration of President Barack Obama's approach to national security was an attempt to channel the moderate realism of the George H.W. Bush administration. The beginnings of the "Arab awakening" heralded a second phase, where the realists lost the major arguments over Libya and Egypt. His nominees this week for State and Defense could herald the third phase of Obama's national security approach.

The Realist Prism: The Obama Doctrine 3.0

By , , Column

Are we seeing the opening of the third installment of President Barack Obama’s approach to national security?

The first iteration, beginning in January 2009, was the attempt to deliberately channel the moderate realism of the George H.W. Bush administration. Obama reached across the aisle to invite Bob Gates to remain as secretary of defense and to recruit Gen. Jim Jones as the national security adviser. The administration backed away from the interventionist tendencies of its predecessor, downplayed the importance of democracy promotion and, borrowing a page from the playbook of former Secretary of State Jim Baker, concentrated efforts on pragmatic deal-making with other key powers around the world. For instance, when protests broke out in Iran later that year, the Obama team stayed away from any action that might suggest regime change was in the cards, in order not to close the door on the possibility of reaching a comprehensive settlement with the Islamic Republic over its nuclear program -- a stance that was criticized on both sides of the U.S. political spectrum. ...

To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review

Individual
Free Trial

  • TWO WEEKS FREE.
  • Cancel any time.
  • After two weeks, just $11.99 monthly or $94.99/year.
subscribe

Institutional
Subscriptions

Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.

request trial

Login

Already a member? Click the button below to login.

login