The coming months mark the 10th anniversary of the start of a disastrous period for American diplomacy. A decade ago, the State Department languished on the sidelines as the Bush administration prepared for war in Iraq. On Feb. 5, 2003, then-Secretary of State Colin Powell went to the United Nations to argue that Saddam Hussein was still developing weapons of mass destruction. Powell knew that the case was weak, but he also knew that there was no hope for real diplomacy over Iraq. Washington wanted war.
Ten years on, diplomacy is back in fashion in Washington. As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton has restored much of the confidence the State Department lost in the Bush era. Her successor-designate, Sen. John Kerry, is likely to continue the healing process. It is obvious that as president, Barack Obama retains tight control over crucial foreign policy decisions, but it is equally obvious that he is a believer in the power of persuasion in international affairs. His pick for secretary of defense, former Sen. Chuck Hagel, also has a history of defending engagement with America’s foes, including Iran. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
Sign up for two weeks of free access with your credit card. Cancel any time during the free trial and you will be charged nothing.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Strategic Horizons: For Hint of Iraq’s Future, Take Another Look at Vietnam War
- France’s Hollande Exploits Political Openings to Deepen Gulf Ties
- Reality Check: The Real Iraq War Debate’s Lessons for U.S. Foreign Policy
- Diplomatic Fallout: Can Putin Rebrand Russia as Stabilizing Force in Ukraine, Syria?
- Islamic State’s Local Propaganda Key to Understanding Appeal