Russian President Vladimir Putin’s deferral in late-October of a planned visit to India, now scheduled to take place in late-December, encapsulates a bilateral relationship buffeted by shifting global geo-economics but still lucrative for both parties. The postponement reflects the fact that euphemisms such as “strategic partnership” do not automatically translate into preferential treatment in commercial matters in a world increasingly driven by interests over ideology and history.
A number of unresolved issues had built up on both sides that precluded the possibility of a successful summit meeting. Topping the list is New Delhi’s decision to bring any additional Russian-built reactors at the Kudankulam site in south India -- beyond the first two presently under construction -- online under the ambit of India’s controversial 2010 civil nuclear liability law. The Russians have argued that all future reactors at the site should be grandfathered in under the two sides’ 1988 intergovernmental agreement, which has no provision for a right of recourse by the operator in the event of an accident due to faulty components sold by a vendor. India’s new nuclear liability law makes the supplier liable in such cases. According to the Russians, the increased liability will significantly increase the price of follow-on units and lead to a review of the export-credit mechanism Moscow extended for the initial reactors. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
- TWO WEEKS FREE.
- Cancel any time.
- After two weeks, just $9 monthly or $59/year.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- China-India Border Incident Highlights Uncertainties in Bilateral Relations
- Russia Tries to Manage Arab Awakening From the Outside
- Diplomatic Fallout: A More Hawkish Europe Gives U.S. Second Thoughts
- The Realist Prism: Narrowed Focus in U.S.-Russia Relations Proves Productive
- As U.S. Leaves Afghanistan, India Reconsiders Iran Policy