For a man who regularly receives disturbing reports from war zones, last week was a particularly bad one for U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. As fighting escalated in Gaza and rebel forces launched new offensives in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo -- where U.N. peacekeepers are on the front line -- Ban also had to manage the fallout from an internal report (.pdf) on the U.N.’s performance during the final phase of the Sri Lankan civil war in 2009. The report tells an appalling story.
U.N. officials in Sri Lanka, the report shows, avoided confronting the government over the fierce assault launched by the Sri Lankan army against Tamil rebels. The offensive killed at least 40,000 civilians and potentially as many as 70,000, according to “credible” sources cited in the report. U.N. higher-ups in New York did no better. “The absence of any form of central coordination and common sense of purpose or responsibility,” one passage states, “made it impossible for the U.N. to formulate a comprehensive vision or plan of action.” ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
Sign up for two weeks of free access with your credit card. Cancel any time during the free trial and you will be charged nothing.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Strategic Horizons: Obama’s Islamic State Strategy Avoids Failure—but Also Success
- Yemen’s Women Fight to Protect Uprising’s Gains Amid New Turmoil
- Russia Becomes the Middle East’s Preferred but Flawed Nuclear Partner
- Diplomatic Fallout: U.N. Serves as Perfect Alibi for Big Power Inaction in Unfixable Crises
- Vietnam’s Workers Use Local Strikes to Push Party for Reforms