Rarely a week passes without a grim new article, op-ed or newspaper story warning us that al-Qaida is mounting a comeback. Retired U.S. Army Gen. Jack Keane, for instance, recently declared that al-Qaida is "seeking to take advantage of the opportunities posed by revolutionary change throughout the Middle East" and is "on the rise." Writing for the Wall Street Journal, the RAND Corporation's Seth Jones argued that, with the Obama administration turning its attention to the Asia-Pacific region, al-Qaida is pushing into the political vacuum created by the Arab Spring and "riding a resurgent wave as its affiliates engage in a violent campaign of attacks across the Middle East and North Africa." Al-Qaida is showing new life in Afghanistan and Iraq as well.
What should we make of this? Is it true that the United States gave al-Qaida a new lease on life by leaving Iraq and Afghanistan too early? Has Washington failed to act aggressively to keep al-Qaida sympathizers from filling the vacuum created as governments in Yemen, Libya and Mali collapsed? In a sense, yes. However, all of these decisions reflect an accurate assessment of the current nature and extent of the al-Qaida threat and the strategic costs of dealing with it. Sound strategy is not simply quashing enemies, but doing so in a way that the security gains are worth the strategic costs, whether in money, blood or lost opportunities. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
- TWO WEEKS FREE.
- Cancel any time.
- After two weeks, just $11.99 monthly or $94.99/year.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- The Realist Prism: Falling Energy Prices Offer New Strategic Opportunities for the U.S.
- Torture Report: Another Episode in CIA’s History of Violating Oversight
- Strategic Horizons: To Create Order, the U.S. Needs a Strategic Vision
- The Realist Prism: In U.S.-Russia Relations, Differences Now Outweigh Overlapping Interests
- Global Insights: In Asia, Confusion About U.S. Priorities Threatens Goals of Pivot