The Realist Prism: Romney Fails to Capitalize on Overseas Trip

The Realist Prism: Romney Fails to Capitalize on Overseas Trip

There are several reasons why American presidential candidates include overseas trips as part of their campaigning. First, and particularly important for those aspirants who lack significant foreign policy experience, it allows American voters to get a preview as to how the candidate might represent the United States on the global stage by interacting with foreign leaders and communicating with international audiences. In 2008, then-Sen. Barack Obama's jaunt across the Atlantic, especially his "rock star" rally in Berlin's Tiergarten and his visit to U.S. troops in Iraq, was quite successful in positioning the junior senator from Illinois as a plausible world leader. Second, a candidate may travel abroad to signal what his foreign policy priorities would be, or to draw contrasts with his predecessor or his rival. Then-Gov. George W. Bush's trip to Mexico in 2000 was designed to signal, both to Latin America as well as to a rising Latino constituency in the United States, that he would place more emphasis on America's hemispheric orientation, something that was indeed reflected in U.S. policy for the first months of the new administration, until the attacks of Sept. 11 dramatically shifted the focus elsewhere. Finally, to paraphrase Clausewitz, foreign travel is the continuation of domestic politics by other means. The overseas trip is but another venue to concentrate on key domestic constituencies.

Mitt Romney's trip to Britain, Israel and Poland this week attempted to combine all three of these purposes -- with mixed results.

Certainly, there was a desire to emulate Obama's successful 2008 circuit. Back then, Obama sought to demonstrate that the "international community" still wanted American global leadership, just not the leadership exercised by George W. Bush and proffered by Sen. John McCain. Romney wanted to amplify the narrative of the Obama administration having "abandoned allies" by visiting three stalwart friends of the United States who, he argues, have been neglected or endangered by the policies of the current White House incumbent.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review