To Counter Nuclear Smuggling, Target All Smuggling

To Counter Nuclear Smuggling, Target All Smuggling

As a presidential candidate, Barack Obama asserted that the most immediate and extreme threat to national security was that posed by a terrorist organization acquiring a nuclear weapon. As president, he pledged to mitigate that potentiality by securing all vulnerable nuclear material around the world within four years. Simultaneously, Obama pursued a high-profile nonproliferation and arms control strategy that, despite an intensive investment of political capital, has enjoyed only halting progress. Nuclear reduction negotiations with Russia have stalled. Prospects for multilateral treaties governing nuclear tests and the production of nuclear bomb fuel are distant possibilities at best. Meanwhile, Iran and North Korea march steadily forward with their own enrichment and, in the case of Pyongyang, nuclear testing programs, creating associated proliferation risks. Meanwhile, on Obama’s all important four-year goal, initial ebullience has given way to skepticism and plodding progress, most recently illustrated last month by the Nuclear Security Summit in Seoul, South Korea.

In Seoul, heads of state from more than 50 countries came together to take action against the illicit proliferation of materials and technology that can be used to build nuclear weapons or radiological "dirty bombs." The gathering yielded a series of sporadic new attempts to address the lengthening proliferation supply chain around the globe, building on progress made at the inaugural 2010 Nuclear Security Summit in Washington, which resulted in bolstered efforts to secure fissile material, primarily in post-Soviet countries.

But the fundamental shortcoming of this and other international nonproliferation efforts is their failure to gain worldwide traction. Their claims to be “global” notwithstanding, the lion’s share of nonproliferation programming has been designed by wealthy countries of the developed North, with little relevance to the pressing concerns of the Global South.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review