With the emergence of cyber conflict as an increasingly important concern of policymakers, the possibility is sometimes raised that nations could enter into arms control agreements of some kind to reduce the likelihood that such conflict will occur and/or to reduce or limit the damage that any such conflict might inflict. Advocates of such agreements suggest that they would enhance the cybersecurity posture of the United States. Nonetheless, there are many challenges that stand in the way of reaching such agreements, and progress toward such agreements may well be slower than some observers would like.
In the 21st century, information is an essential coin of the realm, and advanced nation-states are increasingly dependent on information and information technology. Private-sector businesses rely on information technology (IT) to plan, manage and conduct their operations, as do government agencies and military forces. Nations thus have strong incentives to reduce threats that might compromise the IT assets on which their private-sector businesses, civilian government agencies and military forces depend. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
Sign up for two weeks of free access with your credit card. Cancel any time during the free trial and you will be charged nothing.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Reality Check: The Past’s First Lesson: Beware of False Historical Analogies
- Diplomatic Fallout: Marginalized U.N. Fights for Humanitarian Agenda in Middle East
- Global Insights: Russia Tensions Threaten U.S. Arctic Council Agenda
- Diplomatic Fallout: U.N. Serves as Perfect Alibi for Big Power Inaction in Unfixable Crises
- Diplomatic Fallout: Putting Need Before Geopolitics on Post-MDG Development Agenda