The New Rules: Slouching Toward Great-Power War

Arguably the greatest strategic gift offered by America to the world over the past several decades has been our consistent willingness to maintain a high and hugely expensive entry barrier to the “market” that is great-power war: first by deterring outright war with the Soviet Union during the Cold War, and then by maintaining a lopsided and unipolar military superiority in the post-Cold War period. However, a case can be made that in recent years, the greatest threat to this enduring component of global stability arises from within the United States itself -- namely, a national security establishment intent on pressing the boundaries of this heretofore rather sacrosanct responsibility.
The origins of this dangerous rethink stretch back to Ronald Reagan’s original championing of strategic missile defense. Back then, Reagan sold “Star Wars” as a way of making America, and by extension the world, “safe” from the scourge of nuclear war. But, of course, most of the world -- the Soviets included -- suspected a stealthy attempt by America to free only itself from the strictures of mutually assured destruction, the doctrine that underpinned Cold War-era nuclear deterrence. (Unsurprisingly, Moscow still holds that opinion regarding the United States’ expanding missile defense facilities in Eastern Europe.) ...
To read the rest, subscribe to World Politics Review
Buy This Article
- PDF from Scribd
- Kindle version from Amazon
- Global Insights: Factoring China Into U.S.-Russian Nuclear Arms Control
- The Realist Prism: Chen Saga Pits U.S. Rhetoric vs. Interests
- The New Rules: Globalization's Future Depends on Stable U.S.-China-India Order
- ASEAN Struggles for Relevance in South China Sea Disputes
- The Tentative Rise of China's Reformists


