The Realist Prism: Preparing for the 'Day After' in Syria

Now that the United States, France and other Western powers have endorsed the Arab League’s call for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to step down -- even if that formulation is ultimately edited out of the final draft of the resolution pending before the U.N. Security Council -- it is time to start making plans for the various contingencies that may erupt on "the day after."
Most Western policymakers, at least in their public rhetoric, continue to cling to an optimistic scenario in which a broad-based, inclusive opposition takes power in Damascus after an initial transition from Assad’s rule. Reassured of their role in the new Syria, the country’s Alawite and Christian populations, two of the communities that the current regime depends on for bedrock support, would have an incentive to participate peacefully in the post-Assad order. Of course, such a scenario appeals to U.S. and Western publics, weary from a decade of stabilization efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan. It is simply not politically feasible for Western leaders to vigorously champion efforts to force Assad to step down if there is an expectation that Western forces be needed to guarantee the transition. ...
To read the rest, subscribe to World Politics Review
Buy This Article
- PDF from Scribd
- Kindle version from Amazon
- Abu Muqawama: Locating the Real Risk of Syria Spillover in Lebanon, Iraq
- With Eye on Regional Security, U.S. Looks Past Algeria's Flawed Elections
- Deep State: Reading the Tea Leaves Ahead of Iran Nuclear Talks
- Iran's Political Chaos Could Put Domestic, Foreign Policy on Hold
- World Citizen: Israeli Realignment Changes Prospects for Peace and War


