The Realist Prism: Iran's Nuclear Pipedream, and Washington's

With the possibility of a clash between the United States and Iran over Tehran's nuclear program looming on the horizon, one cannot help but wonder: Is it worth it for Iran, now grappling with increasingly onerous sanctions, to continue its pursuit of a nuclear capacity, albeit an ambiguous one?
By all indications, Iran's leaders believe so, based on their read of recent history. Since the end of the Cold War, according to this narrative, regimes that the U.S. dislikes for their internal behavior or external activity -- and Iran certainly qualifies on both scores -- run the risk of being on the receiving end of America's expeditionary firepower, unless they possess a suitable deterrent capability. Serbia in 1999, Iraq in 2003 and Libya in 2011 were all subject to military operations because each country lacked nuclear weapons, giving the United States a free opportunity to strike without fear of dramatic consequences. ...
To read the rest, subscribe to World Politics Review
Buy This Article
- PDF from Scribd
- Kindle version from Amazon
- Deep State: Reading the Tea Leaves Ahead of Iran Nuclear Talks
- Iran's Political Chaos Could Put Domestic, Foreign Policy on Hold
- The Realist Prism: Clearing Iran From the U.S.-India Agenda
- World Citizen: Israeli Realignment Changes Prospects for Peace and War
- Abu Muqawama: U.S. Intel in the Dark Over Israel's Iran Plans


