Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff’s Cabinet has undergone enormous change during her first year in office, with seven ministers sacked, all but one under a cloud of corruption, and at least two more teetering under corruption allegations. Many in the commentariat have been quick to laud these firings as proof of Rousseff’s diligence in fighting sleaze, and her personal approval rating is now higher than that of her two immediate predecessors at the same stage in their first terms. A complete Cabinet overhaul is rumored for the new year, when Rousseff may reorganize the coalition she inherited from her predecessor, the charismatic Luis Inácio Lula da Silva. While expectations are high, the reshuffle seems unlikely to address the underlying roots of the problem, which go far beyond the president and her willingness to clean house.
Brazil’s political system has long operated according to a dangerous compromise, whereby the president is given the tools to govern in exchange for handing out ministries and political appointments to allied parties. The proliferation of parties, ministerial-level positions and political appointments -- currently standing at 29, 39 and more than 23,000, respectively -- has allowed presidents since the mid-1990s to cobble together coalitions that regularly approach three-quarters of Congress. This permitted presidents to govern and implement the difficult constitutional reforms that were needed to drag Brazil into the new century with fiscal balance and economic stability. In exchange, though, the parties that make up the governing coalition are given a relatively free hand in running their ministerial fiefdoms. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
- TWO WEEKS FREE.
- Cancel any time.
- After two weeks, just $9 monthly or $59/year.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.