Russia: Reform Without Revolution?

By Daragh McDowell, on , Briefing

Analysts of Russian politics have always faced a conundrum when assessing developments like December's mass protests in Moscow. Russia has a history of authoritarianism and cultural fatalism that has always discouraged reform. From Peter the Great to Leonid Brezhnev, Russian rulers have shown a near-endless capacity for tricking, co-opting or simply suppressing pro-reform movements. For centuries, developments that in any other nondemocratic regime would signal imminent and inevitable change have routinely failed to breach the Kremlin walls. But in the few historical instances where change has occurred, it has traditionally been rapid and unpredictable. The Bolsheviks took power just months after the fall of Nicolas II in 1917 and lost it in 1991 just as quickly. In both instances, almost no one saw it coming. Hence in assessing the Moscow protests, Russianists are caught in a quandary: treat them as an interesting but meaningless sideshow, or throw caution to the wind and declare that the revolution has begun. The truth may be something in between.

It is important to note that Vladimir Putin and his regime are for the moment in no danger of collapse. While the protesters have managed to mobilize impressive numbers, they are still vastly outnumbered by the majority of Russians who by and large still support, or at least accept, the status quo. More importantly, the various factions of the Russian elite remain more or less united behind him. There is little chance of new parliamentary elections -- a key demand of the protesters -- and even less that Putin will fail to win re-election in March. ...

To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review

Free Trial

  • Cancel any time.
  • After two weeks, just $18 monthly or $118/year.


Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.

request trial


Already a member? Click the button below to login.