Global Insights: The SCO's Expansion Dilemma

Despite expectations, the 10th Meeting of the Prime Ministers of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) held in St. Petersburg, Russia, on Nov. 7, 2011, did not announce the addition of any new full members or full observers. The SCO governments have repeatedly claimed that they need more time to establish the rules and procedures to govern new members. In reality, the existing members have proven unable to overcome their differences regarding which countries should receive membership or observer status. Indeed, some appear to fear that membership enlargement would weaken rather than strengthen the organization.
Clearly the SCO remains stuck in an expansion dilemma. For the sixth year in a row, the organization did not admit any new observers, and the current roster of full members continues to be limited to those that joined the SCO at its founding in 2001: China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Four observer countries -- India, Iran, Mongolia and Pakistan -- were admitted by 2005. Since then, however, the organization has resorted to creating new categories of external association, producing a confusing mixture of full members, formal observers, “guests” of the rotating host government of the annual SCO leadership summit and, most recently, “dialogue partners.” ...
To read the rest, subscribe to World Politics Review
Buy This Article
- PDF from Scribd
- Kindle version from Amazon
- The Realist Prism: A Closer Look at U.S.-Russia 'Summit-gate'
- Global Insights: Factoring China Into U.S.-Russian Nuclear Arms Control
- Moscow Conference Highlights NATO-Russian Gap on Missile Defense
- Global Insights: Building Confidence in the Cyber Domain
- U.S. Magnitsky Bill Confuses Russia's Weakness for Strength


