BEIJING -- Hamstrung by domestic sensitivities and an inadequate institutional framework for managing its proliferating overseas interests, China has found itself behind the curve on Libya. Beijing's response has revealed the disparate interest groups within its foreign policy apparatus and the challenges it faces when responding to international events. Despite previous progress, China's foreign policy apparatus needs to become more adroit at public positioning and more discrete and institutionally consistent in its private diplomacy to secure its international rise.
Last Monday,* Beijing became the last major economic power to recognize Libya's National Transitional Council (NTC), 10 days after Russia did so and a week after the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs acknowledged that Chinese arms manufacturers had discussed weapons sales with representatives of the government of Moammar Gadhafi during its final months in power. China has also been accused of blocking the release of frozen Libyan assets, a charge denied by Beijing but not discordant with their apparent reluctance to withdraw official support for the Gadhafi regime long after it had lost international credibility. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
- TWO WEEKS FREE.
- Cancel any time.
- After two weeks, just $11.99 monthly or $94.99/year.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- The Realist Prism: Falling Energy Prices Offer New Strategic Opportunities for the U.S.
- Diplomatic Fallout: Global Trends Point to Fragmentation of International Crisis Management
- Syria Blowback: U.S. Air Campaign Lethal, but Drives IS Recruitment
- The Realist Prism: In U.S.-Russia Relations, Differences Now Outweigh Overlapping Interests
- China’s Marshall Plan: All Silk Roads Lead to Beijing?