China's Libya Response Reflects Fractured Foreign Policy Apparatus

BEIJING -- Hamstrung by domestic sensitivities and an inadequate institutional framework for managing its proliferating overseas interests, China has found itself behind the curve on Libya. Beijing's response has revealed the disparate interest groups within its foreign policy apparatus and the challenges it faces when responding to international events. Despite previous progress, China's foreign policy apparatus needs to become more adroit at public positioning and more discrete and institutionally consistent in its private diplomacy to secure its international rise.
Last Monday,* Beijing became the last major economic power to recognize Libya's National Transitional Council (NTC), 10 days after Russia did so and a week after the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs acknowledged that Chinese arms manufacturers had discussed weapons sales with representatives of the government of Moammar Gadhafi during its final months in power. China has also been accused of blocking the release of frozen Libyan assets, a charge denied by Beijing but not discordant with their apparent reluctance to withdraw official support for the Gadhafi regime long after it had lost international credibility. ...
To read the rest, subscribe to World Politics Review
Buy This Article
- PDF from Scribd
- Kindle version from Amazon
- Despite Summitry, Hurdles Remain for Northeast Asian Multilateralism
- Global Insights: Factoring China Into U.S.-Russian Nuclear Arms Control
- The Realist Prism: Chen Saga Pits U.S. Rhetoric vs. Interests
- The New Rules: Globalization's Future Depends on Stable U.S.-China-India Order
- ASEAN Struggles for Relevance in South China Sea Disputes


