About Get Alerts Login
February 09, 2010
Browse by Regions and/or Topics

Global Insights: International Nuclear Fuel Banks, the Pros and Cons

Richard Weitz | Bio | 16 Jun 2009
World Politics Review

Login to Discuss EmailEmail | Print IconPrint | Share Icon Share | Reprint IconReprint

In his April 5 disarmament speech in Prague, President Barack Obama endorsed constructing "a new framework for civil nuclear cooperation, including an international fuel bank, so that countries can access peaceful power without increasing the risks of proliferation."

An international uranium fuel bank seeks to address one of the fundamental problems with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) -- namely, that it allows countries to acquire sensitive nuclear technologies that they can then rapidly convert from civilian to military use. According to the most common interpretation of the treaty, states can develop extensive uranium-enrichment and plutonium-reprocessing capabilities while a member in good standing with the NPT, then legitimately withdraw from the treaty simply by giving 90-days' notice as specified in Article 10 of the treaty. They can then use these technologies to make nuclear weapons. ...

subscribe to World Politics Review

WPR

Subscribers receive:

  • Access to in-depth feature articles
  • Regular Strategic Posture Reviews
  • Regular WPR Special Reports
  • Access to our Document Center
  • Access to WPR’s entire archives
  • Enhanced search across the entire site
  • Participation in our discussion section

Click here to subscribe »
Click here to take a free trial »
Already a subscriber? Login here.

Login to Discuss EmailEmail | Print IconPrint | Share Icon Share | Reprint IconReprint